MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Clinical and correlative science results in a phase II study of UCN-01in combination with irinotecan in recurrent triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

2012· article· en· W2603575264 on OpenAlexaff
X. Cynthia, Matthew J. Ellis, Gina R. Petroni, A. Craig Lockhart, Michael Naughton, Timothy Pluard, Christiana Brenin, Joel Picus, Allison Creekmore, Tibu Mwandoro, Zhanfang Guo, Shirong Cai, Christine E. Ryan, Erin Yarde, Jeremy Hoog, Janet Dancey, Mark A. Watson, Helen Piwnica‐Worms, Paula M. Fracasso

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTriple-negative breast cancerIrinotecanTaxaneNeutropeniaInternal medicineOncologyPhases of clinical researchCancerVomitingPeripheral blood mononuclear cellBreast cancerGastroenterologyChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3047 Background: Chk1 inhibitors enhance chemotherapy efficacy by inducing “mitotic catastrophe” in p53 deficient TNBC preclinical models. Irinotecan (I) combined with UCN-01, a nonselective Chk1 inhibitor, showed promising activity in TNBC in our phase I study. The primary objective of the phase II trial was to determine the efficacy and toxicity. Correlatives included assessing tumor molecular subtype, TP53, PTEN and pathways targeted by UCN-01. Methods: Pts with measurable, metastatic (met) TNBC, prior anthracycline (A) and taxane (T), received I (100-125 mg/m2 IV on days (d) 1, 8, 15, 22) and UCN-01 (70 mg/m2 IV on d2 and 35 mg/m2 on d23 and later doses) on a 42-d cycle (C). Archival tumors and serial peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and optional tumor biopsies were collected. Results: Twenty five pts were enrolled. All had prior A and T. The median no. of prior regimens for met disease was 3 (range 1-4). Toxicities included neutropenia, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and hyperglycemia. Best responses included 1 PR, 8 SD (range 2.3-8.6 mos) for a clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD>6 mos) of 3/25 (12%), 95% CI (3, 31%). The median PFS and OS were 2.3 and 11.3 mos, respectively. pS6 was examined since UCN-01 inhibits PDK1. pS6 was reduced in PBMC 24h post UCN-01, but close to baseline by d8. Immunostain of cleaved caspase 3 (CC3), pHistone H3 (pHH3), γH2AX, and pS6 were done on serial biopsies from 4 pts with adequate biopsy materials. In all cases, pS6 was reduced 24h post UCN-01. Results for other markers were variable. One case with TP53 deletion showed an induction of CC3, with an increase in pHH3 and γH2AX, suggesting abrogation of cell cycle arrest and enhanced DNA damage. Among 15 with sufficient specimen for analysis, most were basal-like (basal 10, basal/HER2-E 1, HER2-E 2, Luminal B 2) by PAM50, low in PTEN level (11) and carried mutations in TP53 (8). Median OS was 5.5 (95% CI: 2, 11.3) mos in TP53 mutant and 20.3 (95% CI: 2.9, - ) mos in wild type populations (p=0.004). Conclusions: This regimen had limited activity in TNBC. Despite the long half-life, drug activity is not detectable by d8 based on PBMC analysis. Our data indicates that future trials in TNBC should consider p53 status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.168
GPT teacher head0.561
Teacher spread0.393 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer Treatment and PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207