MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2603655293 · doi:10.1002/9781118590263.ch5

Bitterness in Beverages

2017· other· en· W2603655293 on OpenAlexaff
Ayyappan Appukuttan Aachary, Michael Eskin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFermentation and Sensory Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWineFood scienceMalolactic fermentationPolyphenolAromaContext (archaeology)Aroma of wineChemistryGeographyBiologyAntioxidant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The world consumption of beverages continues to increase annually. A number of these beverages contain bitter components that make them unique yet still quite acceptable by many consumers. Hot tea still remains the most popular beverage worldwide and accounts for around 21% of all beverages consumed. Other popular beverages with bitter flavors include hot coffee, hot cocoa or chocolate, beer, wine and cider. This chapter discusses those compounds responsible for bitterness in these beverages. Cider or apple wine is a popular alcoholic beverage in Europe, North America and Australia. In the context of preparing cider, the content of polyphenols is important as it influences the color of final product and the balance between bitterness to astringency. One of the factors determining the colloidal stability of cider is the content of polyphenols. They are part of alcoholic and malolactic fermentations and exhibit antimicrobial activity as well as in the development of cider aroma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFermentation and Sensory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207