MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2603708840 · doi:10.2312/egp.20161051

Transferring and Animating a non T-pose Model to a T-pose Model

2016· article· en· W2603708840 on OpenAlexaff
Nasim Hajari, Irene Cheng, Anup Basu

Bibliographic record

VenueEurographics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHuman Motion and Animation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePoseAnimationSkeleton (computer programming)Computer visionArtificial intelligenceArticulated body pose estimationTransformation (genetics)SoftwareComputer graphics (images)Computer animation3d model3D pose estimationProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non T-pose animation is a technique that attempts to generate natural transformations between any non T-pose skeletons to the neutral T-pose skeleton. It is not always easy to extract or embed a T-pose animation skeleton into a 3D human model in an arbitrary initial position. This is even more problematic for natural human models obtained by 3D scanning, especially models of babies and kids. In addition, transforming a non T-pose to a T-pose requires a large amount of calculations. Hence, many commercially available software do not provide efficient methods to standardize non T-pose skeletons. This paper focuses on developing a simplified transformation method, which enables skeletons in arbitrary poses to be standardized and used in other media conveniently.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEurographicsSame topicHuman Motion and AnimationFrench-language works237,207