MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2603811069 · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbx023.121

SA125. Characteristics and Early Outcome of Deprived Women With Psychosis in Hong Kong

2017· article· en· W2603811069 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christy Lai Ming Hui, WT Ko

Bibliographic record

VenueSchizophrenia Bulletin · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApathyWechsler Adult Intelligence ScaleMemory spanMedicineDepression (economics)NeurocognitivePsychopathologyPsychiatryAnxietyClinical psychologyPsychosisPsychologyCognitionWorking memory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: It has been reported that women facing financial hardship are more likely to be affected by mental illnesses, including depression and anxiety, in pregnant women. Whether similar differences exist in this disadvantaged subgroup among psychosis patients is, however, unclear. The current study aims to compare the baseline characteristics and early clinical and functioning outcome at 6 months between the financially deprived women with psychosis in Hong Kong and their nondeprived counterparts. Methods: Participants were recruited from a territory-wide early intervention program for adult (25–55 years old) psychosis patients in Hong Kong. Ninety-three financially deprived female patients and 105 nondeprived female patients were included. Their baseline demographics, premorbid, clinical, neurocognitive, and functioning characteristics were compared. The 6-month clinical and functioning outcome of the 2 groups were also compared. Results: At baseline, deprived women have higher PANSS score (P = .010), higher general psychopathology (P = .010), and higher SANS score in avolition-apathy (P = .003) and anhedonia-asociality (P = .008). In terms of functioning, deprived women have lower SOFAS score (P = .002) compared to nondeprived women. They also performed worse in age-adjusted WAIS-R information test (P = .001), WAIS-R arithmetic test (P = .002), WAIS-R forward digit span (P < .001), WAIS-R backward digit span (P = .003), visual patterns tests (P = .002), digit symbols (P < .001), and verbal fluency (P < .001). At 6 months, financially deprived women also have severer symptoms compared to nondeprived women, with higher SAPS scores (P = .045), higher SANS avolition-apathy scores (P = .005), higher scores in Calgary Depression Scale (P = .003). Also, deprived women have lower SOFAS score (P = .003). Conclusion: The current results shows that differences exist in baseline characteristics and early outcome between female patients with and without financial hardship. Deprived women have more severe symptoms, worse social and occupational functioning, and worse cognitive ability at baseline. Early outcome of deprived women was also found to be worse, with severer symptoms and worse social and occupation function. It shows that female psychosis patients facing financial hardship may require additional assistance and attention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSchizophrenia BulletinSame topicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumFrench-language works237,207