MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2603904802 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2017.2688451

Exploiting the Fast Spectral Roll-Off of CPM Sidelobes to Improve Bandwidth Efficiency in Satellite Communications

2017· article· en· W2603904802 on OpenAlexaff
Ulaş Güntürkün

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUltra Electronics (Canada)
FundersASELSAN
KeywordsComputer scienceContinuous phase modulationSpectral efficiencyDemodulationDetectorBandwidth (computing)MultiplexingElectronic engineeringBit error rateMinimum mean square errorAdjacent-channel interferenceCommunications satelliteSingle antenna interference cancellationInterference (communication)Decoding methodsChannel (broadcasting)AlgorithmTelecommunicationsSatellitePhysicsEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Simple and efficient carrier-overlapping and interference-reduction techniques are addressed for frequency-division multiplexing-continuous phase modulation (FDM-CPM) schemes. CPM carriers are densely multiplexed (packed) in the frequency-domain, without leaving any guard bands, thus allowing frequency content in adjacent bands to overlap, so as to enhance the bandwidth efficiency. The intentional adjacent channel interference, introduced by carrier-overlapping during transmission, is combated at the receiver front-end using simple interference-reduction filters that are designed to exploit the fast roll-off of CPM spectral sidelobes. The receiver back-end is governed by a serially concatenated CPM iterative demodulation/decoding detector. Numerically optimal carrier-packing ratios are determined with respect to information-theoretic bounds. The presented method does not require cooperation among users, and is extended to QAM and PSK schemes as well. Bit error rate analyses show that the proposed non-cooperative receiver design facilitates bandwidth and energy-efficient communication for both the nonlinear and linear satellite channels, without resorting to multiuser detectors, and becomes an attractive solution when cooperation may not be feasible among users that are geographically spread-out.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207