MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ex post Impact Evaluation of Chashma Right Bank Canal on Land Use in D. I. Khan District, Pakistan

2012· article· en· W2603961462 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Atta‐ur Rahman, Amir Nawaz Khan

Bibliographic record

VenueArab world geographer · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Economic Development in India
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKhyber pakhtunkhwaGeographySuez canalAgricultureProductivitySocioeconomicsIrrigationAridAgricultural economicsEnvironmental protectionWater resource managementEconomic growthArchaeologyEcologyEconomicsEnvironmental scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article carries out an ex post impact evaluation of the Chashma Right Bank Canal (CRBC) on land use in D.I. Khan district, located in Pakistan's arid ecological zone. Work on the CRB Irrigation Project (CRBIP) began in 1984 and was completed in three stages during 2003. CRBC commands 250 000 ha of land spread over the provinces of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Punjab; its ultimate goal was to enhance agricultural productivity and employment opportunities and to alleviate poverty. Widespread changes in the cultural environment have resulted from the CRBC, which has led to many short- and long-term local and regional changes. The study found that after CRBC, cultivated land increased and waste land has decreased in area, especially in the CRBC command tract. However, no significant changes were reported from outside the CRBC command area during the study period. Analysis reveals that agricultural enhancement has produced a gradual increase in the uncultivated area, but that this development has mostly come at...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArab world geographerSame topicSocial and Economic Development in IndiaFrench-language works237,207