MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An open label safety and efficacy phase 2a study of the N-cadherin (N-cad) antagonist ADH-1 in subjects with N-cadherin expressing solid tumors

2007· article· en· W2604044102 on OpenAlexaff
Quincy S. Chu, Jennifer J. Knox, Gerald Batist, Peter Venner, K. N., Laura M. Woods, Howard A. Burris, R. K. Malik, W. P. Peters, Derek J. Jonker

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related gene regulation
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineBreast cancerMetastasisMetastatic breast cancerOncologyCancerCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3567 Background: Malignant transformation and invasive capacity is highly correlated with N-cad, a cell adhesion molecule expressed on tumor cells and vascular endothelium. ADH-1, a cyclic pentapeptide (CHAVC), is a functional inhibitor of N-cad, and produces apoptosis and tumor vascular disruption in preclinical models. We report results from a Phase 2a study of intravenous (IV) ADH-1 (q 3 W, modified to qW) in subjects with N-cad+ solid tumors. Methods: Subjects with the following N-cad+ refractory tumors with measurable disease were eligible: renal cell (RCC); hepatocellular (HCC); adrenocortical (ACC); gastroesophageal (GE); NSCLC; HNSCC; and breast (HSNCC and breast subjects were only eligible for q3W schedule). ADH-1 was administered at 500 mg/m2 q 3 W, or 600 mg/m2 in the qW schedule. Intra-subject dose escalation was permitted at cycle 3 to 600 mg/m2 (900 mg/m2 with the qW schedule) in the absence of significant toxicity, tumor response or progression. Results: Tumor samples from 159 subjects were tested for N-cad, and 90 were N-cad+ (N-cad+/number tested: GE 13/48, HCC 29/35; NSCLC 16/33; RCC 27/28; ACC 3/8; HNSCC 2/6; Breast 0/1). Forty subjects, 10 on the q3W and 30 on the qW schedule (19 HCC; 7 RCC; 6 NSCLC; 6 GE; 1 ACC; 1 HNSCC) received 121 cycles of ADH-1. The drug was well tolerated, with commonly reported adverse events being Grade 1 or 2 in severity. One subject with HCC had pre-existing renal insufficiency, developed Grade 2 nausea and vomiting 11 days after the 3rd cycle of ADH-1 administered q 3W, leading to non-oliguric renal failure. Following an initial period of recovery, she developed sepsis and died; these events were considered to not be related to study drug. A second subject with HCC developed a hemiparesis due to a Grade 3 intracranial hemorrhage from a previously unknown metastatic brain lesion, 5 days after the 1st dose of ADH-1. There were no complete or partial responses; 32 subjects had SD for =2 cycles, 8 had SD for =4 cycles (4 HCC, ACC, GE, RCC, HNSCC), 6 had SD for =6 cycles (3 HCC, GE, RCC, HNSCC). The longest duration on study was 12 cycles (RCC). Conclusions: ADH-1 was well tolerated and prolonged SD was noted in several subjects. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.469
Teacher spread0.394 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer-related gene regulationFrench-language works237,207