Track wheel - a hybrid vehicle suspension system
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A description and analysis is presented of a new alternative vehicle suspension system with anticipated good all–terrain performance characteristics. A small–scale development project on track wheel has now reached the stage where early results can be reported which confirm expected features. Track wheels can be made with tracks of three different basic designs. Tracks of two designs can be fabricated using well–developed technology. Several prototype models were made and tested. Tracks of the third design, identified as 'spring track' are more difficult to make but hold the best promise of good vehicle suspension performance. An analysis of a track wheel with a spring track shows the relationship between track wheel load capacity, track deflection, track dimensions and material properties. It shows that spring tracks made from high tensile metals, or possibly from reinforced plastic composite materials, will in theory meet the suspension requirements in many vehicles. Anticipated spring track wheel performance is also described in terms of estimated rolling resistance and estimated dynamic suspension characteristics. It is suggested that further development of track wheel, and in particular of spring track, will lead to a major advance in vehicle suspension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it