On limiting velocity with Weber-like potentials
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work analyses the problem of a charge moving perpendicularly to the plates of a charged capacitor. The results obtained from the current theoretical framework (Maxwell–Lorentz electromagnetism and special relativity theory) are compared with the results obtained from Weber’s electrodynamic potential, with the Phipps’s potential and a new potential proposed here. The aim of this comparison is to analyse the causes of the inability of these Weber-like potentials to predict the existence of a limiting velocity for this problem, as special relativity theory does indeed predict and many experimental results confirm. To overcome this incapacity, the need to employ an effective potential to solve the capacitor problem is shown. In the adoption of this strategy, it is shown that the potential proposed here reproduces the same relativistic result. Finally, the origin and possible interpretation of the aforementioned effective potential are analysed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it