MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2604149282 · doi:10.1161/res.109.suppl_1.ap302

Abstract P302: CaMKII Is Not Critical for Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury

2011· article· en· W2604149282 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Weinreuter, Lorenz Lehmann, Michael M. Kreußer, Hermann‐Josef Gröne, Oliver J. Müller, Eric N. Olson, Hugo A. Katus, Johannes Backs

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsStuart Olson (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIschemiaReperfusion injuryIn vivoCardioprotectionMedicinespliceInternal medicineChemistryEndocrinologyBiologyBiochemistryGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: The role of the Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) in Ischemia/Reperfusion of the heart (I/R) has not completely been clarified yet - partly due to lacking evidence from animal studies with specific gene knockout (KO) strategies. Moreover, the contribution of the nuclear and cytosolic CaMKIIδ splice variants δB and δC to I/R-induced myocardial damage have been controversially discussed. To investigate the role of CaMKII in myocardial I/R we used several KO mice with genetic deletion of the two major isoforms expressed in the heart, CaMKIIδ and CaMKIIγ, respectively. Both single and double KO models were examined. In addition, we developed a reliable approach to express CaMKII δB and δC splice variants in CaMKIIδ-null mice using adeno-associated-virus serotype 9 (AAV9) to investigate their specific roles in I/R. Methods and Results: A surgical in vivo I/R model was used following two protocols: 30 minutes ischemia with 48 hours of subsequent reperfusion (30/48) and 60 minutes ischemia followed by a 24 hour reperfusion period (60/24). Planimetric measurements of infarct size after staining with Evans Blue and Triphenyl tetrazolium chloride showed no significant difference between CaMKII KO and control groups (infarct-zone/area-at-risk ratio for 30/48-protocol: CaMKIIγ −/− vs. C57/Bl6: 0.49 ± 0.04 vs. 0.43 ± 0.05, p=0.43, n≥6; CaMKIIδ −/− vs. C57/Bl6: 0.42 ± 0.04 vs. 0.44 ± 0.04, p=0.69, n≥19; infarct-zone/area-atrisk ratio for 60/24-protocol: CaMKIIδ −/− vs. C57/Bl6: 0.52 ± 0.02 vs. 0.56 ± 0.03, p=0.33, n≥8; CaMKIIγ loxP/loxP δ loxP/loxP ; alphaMHC-Cre vs. CaMKIIγ loxP/loxP δ loxP/loxP : 0.52 ± 0.03 vs. 0.52 ± 0.04, p=0.86, n≥9). Consistently, no differences in high-sensitive serum troponin T levels 24 hours after onset of ischemia could be detected. Neither histologic TUNEL-staining nor Caspase3/7-acivity assays revealed any significant differences in apoptotic cell death processes. Importantly, specific expression of CaMKII δB or δC splice variants via AAV9 gene transfer - at approximate endogenous protein levels - in CaMKIIδ −/− mice had no effect on infarct size and necrotic or apoptotic markers. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that CaMKII is not critical for myocardial infarct size and apoptosis in response to I/R.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.163
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation ResearchSame topicMitochondrial Function and PathologyFrench-language works237,207