MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2604152283 · doi:10.18280/mmep.040104

Static analysis of P-FGM beams resting on the Winkler elastic foundations

2017· article· en· W2604152283 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fouad Boukhelf, Bachir Bouiadjra Mohamed

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgence Thématique de Recherche en Science et Technologie
KeywordsStructural engineeringMaterials sciencePhysicsMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper investigates bending behavior of P-FGM beam resting on the elastic foundation including Winkler springs. Exact solutions obtained from closed-form formulation based on generalized shear deformation beam theory which can be adapted to various beams theories for bending analysis of such beam are presented. An accuracy of the present solutions is validated numerically by comparisons with some available results in the literature. Various significant parameters P-FGM volume fraction, spring constant factors, beam thickness, etc. are taken into investigation. According to the numerical results, it is revealed that the deflection of the beams is found to decrease as the increase of spring constant factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicComposite Structure Analysis and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207