MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2604212690 · doi:10.11646/zootaxa.2033.1.3

Revision of the Neotropical genus Goniaspis Duda (Diptera: Chloropidae)

2009· article· en· W2604212690 on OpenAlexaff
Julia J. Mlynarek, Terry A. Wheeler

Bibliographic record

VenueZootaxa · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsType localityGenusBiologyType (biology)Type speciesZoologyTribeSAINTEcologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Neotropical genus Goniaspis Duda is revised. The genus includes ten species: G. equalis (Williston) (type locality: Saint Vincent); G. lucia sp. n. (type locality: Saint Lucia); G. lurida sp. n. (type locality: Blue Creek, Belize); G. obscurata Duda (type locality: San José, Costa Rica); G. opaca sp. n. (type locality: San José, Costa Rica); G. rubra (Becker) (type species of genus, type locality: Sierra san Lorenzo, Colombia); G. scutellaris (Williston) (type locality: Saint Vincent); G. subaequalis (Malloch) (type locality: Montserrat, Trinidad); G. truncata (Malloch) (type locality: Trece Aguas, Guatemala); and G. versicolor sp. n. (type locality: La Paz, Bolivia). The identity of G. peruana Duda cannot be determined and it is considered a species inquirenda. All recognized species are described and illustrated, and a key to species is included. Goniaspis has been assigned to the Hippelates genus group (or tribe Hippelatini) in previous higher classifications of the Chloropidae, based primarily on the possession of a strong, ventral, hind-tibial spur. However, this character state is subject to frequent homoplasy in the Chloropidae, and multiple morphological character states suggest that Goniaspis may be more closely related to the genus Elachiptera Macquart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZootaxaSame topicHymenoptera taxonomy and phylogenyFrench-language works237,207