MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2604212690 · doi:10.11646/zootaxa.2033.1.3

Revision of the Neotropical genus Goniaspis Duda (Diptera: Chloropidae)

2009· article· en· W2604212690 on OpenAlexaff
Julia J. Mlynarek, Terry A. Wheeler

Bibliographic record

VenueZootaxa · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsType localityGenusBiologyType (biology)Type speciesZoologyTribeSAINTEcologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Neotropical genus Goniaspis Duda is revised. The genus includes ten species: G. equalis (Williston) (type locality: Saint Vincent); G. lucia sp. n. (type locality: Saint Lucia); G. lurida sp. n. (type locality: Blue Creek, Belize); G. obscurata Duda (type locality: San José, Costa Rica); G. opaca sp. n. (type locality: San José, Costa Rica); G. rubra (Becker) (type species of genus, type locality: Sierra san Lorenzo, Colombia); G. scutellaris (Williston) (type locality: Saint Vincent); G. subaequalis (Malloch) (type locality: Montserrat, Trinidad); G. truncata (Malloch) (type locality: Trece Aguas, Guatemala); and G. versicolor sp. n. (type locality: La Paz, Bolivia). The identity of G. peruana Duda cannot be determined and it is considered a species inquirenda. All recognized species are described and illustrated, and a key to species is included. Goniaspis has been assigned to the Hippelates genus group (or tribe Hippelatini) in previous higher classifications of the Chloropidae, based primarily on the possession of a strong, ventral, hind-tibial spur. However, this character state is subject to frequent homoplasy in the Chloropidae, and multiple morphological character states suggest that Goniaspis may be more closely related to the genus Elachiptera Macquart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.600

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZootaxaSame topicHymenoptera taxonomy and phylogenyFrench-language works237,207