MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2604228264 · doi:10.1353/scb.2008.0008

The Enlightenment Cyborg: A History of Communications and Control in the Human Machine 1660–1830 by Allison Muri

2008· review· en· W2604228264 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kenneth Craven

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Scriblerian and the Kit-Cats · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDiverse Historical and Scientific Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnlightenmentContext (archaeology)CyberneticsDualismSociologyEpistemologyPhilosophyEnvironmental ethicsArt historyArtHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

81 will find myself returning to, learning more each time, since it touches on many important issues that Restoration scholars cannot ignore. Tim Harris Brown University ALLISON MURI. The Enlightenment Cyborg : A History of Communications and Control in the Human Machine 1660– 1830. Toronto: Toronto, 2007. Pp. viii ⫹ 308. $60. Teeming issues consuming all of us surround the slow, but sure systemic changes wrought in our time by the increasing meld of technology with the human organism. We are all at risk. The cyborg image is Ms. Muri’s vehicle for this profound ontological review of who we imagine we are in the great scheme of things; she proceeds by enlisting the philosophies, sciences, medicines, humanities, and literatures of the best minds from the seventeenth century until now. The cyborg is defined as the living organism modified by technology or as the human machine. The singular groundbreaking contribution of Ms. Muri’s interdisciplinary study is to integrate , for perhaps the first time, these major systemic changes with their ignored Enlightenment past and worrisome indeterminate future. Fearlessly, the book spread-eagles cybernetic research from Fanny Hill and Terminator to Cartesian dualism and the genome project. While Ms. Muri recognizes that cybernetics is firmly rooted in posteverything , the contemporary idea of the cyborg is unforgivably missing the historical context of the literary figure and anatomical model of seventeenthand eighteenth-century corollary understandings . For example, her new approach creatively links the cyborg with the metaphorical relation of the body and the book. Through thorough analysis of such missing linkages, she competently redresses this historical imbalance . Consequently, Ms. Muri’s brilliance is her encyclopedic ability to make a connection between early Enlightenment scientific theory and its social and political thought on the cyborg and late twentieth-century feminism, socialism, and conservatism that use the cyborg as a politicized trope. This rare and compelling tie-in between Enlightenment and postmodern worlds on cyborg art and scientific theory is an interdisciplinary triumph. At the same time, the study sends up a woeful signal that widely quoted eminent contemporary authorities lack intimate familiarity with, context for, and communication between literary and intellectual historians and all other interdisciplinary resonances throughout Enlightenment studies. In contrast, Ms. Muri’s overview treatment of two systemic changes now in flux, in particular , command attention: the connections of woman-machine and science-humanities : the two final chapters, respectively . In the first instance, the transfer of gender power, like the gradual universal loss of the male hormone and global warming, is happening, but its impact , as this study demonstrates, is far more glacial and more elemental. Since the 1960s, the rising feminist movement (and concomitant eighteenth-century studies) has been impoverished by the uniform failure of presentists and futurists of both sexes to see the titanic , millennial systemic gender change in global power, and its complementary historical framework of monumen- 82 tal, sweeping, and irreversible change. These slow gender shifts cry out for centennial and millennial historical contexts like this study. Ms. Muri devotes pages 167–225 to her chapter on the present and past of ‘‘The Woman-Machine: Techno-lust and Techno-reproduction.’’ One chapter subhead reads ‘‘Why Do Cyborgs Need Boobs?’’ and is symptomatic of both the strengths and weaknesses of this ambitious book in dealing with a subject of such contemporary magnitude despite sparse previous historical examination. Massive current popular fiction and film on cyborg encourages use of the slang vernacular and, more critically, makes the chapter overall top-heavy with the present. The magnitude of both popular and contemporary scholarly interest places two necessary, but heavy, weights on every chapter from the introductory one to the conclusion. It is the price the author and the reader pay to reach Ms. Muri’s insights. Nevertheless, the en passant pithy commentary and the well balanced conclusions make this seminal book a valuable contribution to both studies on the Enlightenment and systemic change. In concluding the woman-machine chapter , for example, Ms. Muri summarizes ‘‘provocative similarities between the eighteenth-century auto-female mechanism and the female cyborg today.’’ ‘‘In the case of Fanny Hill, her sexual desires are still guided by mechanical response and still in need of male direction , government, and ideally...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.575
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Scriblerian and the Kit-CatsSame topicDiverse Historical and Scientific StudiesFrench-language works237,207