MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2604249670 · doi:10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10788

Convex Co-Embedding for Matrix Completion with Predictive Side Information

2017· article· en· W2604249670 on OpenAlex
Yuhong Guo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMatrix completionEmbeddingLow-rank approximationMatrix (chemical analysis)Matrix decompositionComputer scienceMatrix normAlgorithmExploitMathematical optimizationMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Matrix completion as a common problem in many application domains has received increasing attention in the machine learning community. Previous matrix completion methods have mostly focused on exploiting the matrix low-rank property to recover missing entries. Recently, it has been noticed that side information that describes the matrix items can help to improve the matrix completion performance. In this paper, we propose a novel matrix completion approach that exploits side information within a principled co-embedding framework. This framework integrates a low-rank matrix factorization model and a label embedding based prediction model together to derive a convex co-embedding formulation with nuclear norm regularization. We develop a fast proximal gradient descent algorithm to solve this co-embedding problem. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated on two types of real world application problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.624
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it