Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dense gases are characterised by molecules featuring large numbers of active degrees of freedom (quantified by the cv/R ratio). The isentropes in such gases have the distinct property of following rather closely the isotherms (the two become identical in the limit of cv/R going to infinity). Near the liquid-vapour critical point, this makes the isentropes very shallow and possibly concave (in the pressure-specific volume diagram). Whilst shallow isentropes are desirable when designing expanders (i.e. a large specific-volume increase may be achieved for virtually no pressure drop), could such extreme compressibility effects modify turbulence in a profound manner? This paper discusses two particularly interesting aspects: (i) shock-refraction properties (i.e. the way a shock can redistribute the energy of incoming perturbations), (ii) enstrophy production in homogeneous turbulence. A linear interaction analysis (LIA) is conducted on the shock configuration for which the incoming perturbation is decomposed into linear modes of the compressible Euler equations. The transmission coefficients relative to each eigen modes are solved analytically and results are compared against fully non-linear compressible direct numerical simulation reproducing the weak perturbation of an isolated two-dimensional compression shock wave. The linear analysis is found to be capable of predicting the shock-induced redistribution of the energy of the incoming perturbation between the different eigen modes. Non-ideal gas effects are observed both analytically and numerically with especially an unusual selective response for some particular choice of incoming Mach number. A two-dimensional isotropic turbulence configuration is then numerically investigated for the case of an inviscid compressible dense-gas flow close to the liquid-vapour critical point. Strong non-ideal-gas effects on enstrophy production are observed with the formation of eddy shocklets. In both cases non-convex isentropes close to the liquid-vapour critical point are extremely influential in letting both the shock and the turbulence redistribute any supply of turbulence kinetic energy in ways which are simply not observable in ideal gases. This will hopefully spark enthusiasm amongst turbulence modellers (and their end users?).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".