MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2604266759 · doi:10.1139/cjps2013-134

AC Sundancer™ poplar

2013· article· en· W2604266759 on OpenAlexaffabout
William R. Schroeder, Raju Soolanayakanahally, C. H. Lindquist

Bibliographic record

VenueBioOne Complete (BioOne) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBioenergy crop production and management
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHabitAgricultureTree (set theory)GeographyAgroforestryForestryAgronomyBiologyArchaeologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Schroeder, W., Soolanayakanahally, R. and Lindquist, C. 2013. AC Sundancer™ Poplar. Can. J. Plant Sci. 93: 1285-1287. AC Sundancer™ is a male, winter-hardy hybrid poplar tree released by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Agroforestry Development Centre for the Canadian prairies and United States northern Great Plains. The name AC Sundancer™ was chosen as it depicts the striking upright growth habit of the tree.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.306
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.089 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioOne Complete (BioOne)Same topicBioenergy crop production and managementFrench-language works237,207