MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2604286168

The Photomultiplier Tube Calibration of the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory

2001· article· en· W2604286168 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. Cameron

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotomultiplierObservatoryCalibrationRemote sensingPhysicsOpticsAstronomyGeologyDetector
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PMTs, and restores the time resolution to the extent possible. The PMT calibration also converts the integrated charge into the same units for all PMTs. This thesis describes how the PMT calibration is implemented and presents the results of investigations into its performance. The PMT calibration is found to perform well and is crucial to the analysis of SNO data. The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO) is a solar neutrino experiment designed to search for neutrino flavour oscillations. It is located 2040m underground in the INCO, Ltd. Creighton mine near Sudbury, Ontario. The detector consists of a kilotonne of heavy water (D sub 2 O) viewed by approximately 9,500 Photomultiplier Tubes (PMTs). The PMTs detect Cerenkov photons produced following the interactions of sup 8 B solar neutrinos with the D sub 2 O. These neutrinos can interact with D sub 2 O in three different ways. This allows the electron neutrino flux and the total flux of all flavours of neutrino to be measured. In order to distinguish the different types of reaction, it is essential to reconstruct where the interactions took place in the detector. The reconstruction critically depends on an accurate knowledge of the relative times at which the PMTs detect the Cerenkov photons. The first results from SNO provide strong evidence for neutrino oscillations and have further constrained the possible values of the square of the neutrino mass differences and the neutrino mixing angles. The topic of this thesis is the Photomultiplier Tube Calibration. The SNO electronics record a time and an integrated charge for each PMT that is triggered by a photon. The recorded time has an unknown offset and the time resolution of the PMTs is degraded by an effect arising from variations in the pulse sizes. The PMT calibration removes the time offsets, giving the relative timing of the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)Same topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207