Experimental and Theoretical Analysis of Ink Dispersion Stability for Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aggregate size in fuel cell catalyst inks depends on the type of dispersion medium, particle concentration, and addition of stabilizing agents. In this work, ink stability and particle size of carbon black and carbon black/Nafion dispersions in four non-aqueous media, viz., methanol, ethanol, isopropanol and ethyl acetate are studied. Based on visual inspection, isopropanol is found to be the best medium for dispersion of carbon black inks. To rationalize this observation, a semi-empirical model based on diffusion-limited aggregation was developed to evaluate the rate of particle aggregation and predict the ink stability time for each dispersion medium. The proposed model supports the experimental observation by qualitatively predicting the same relationship between carbon stability and the dispersion media. The model also showed that the dielectric constant of the dispersion medium and the particle zeta potential are primarily responsible for the ink stability. Particle size for the different inks was determined by dynamic light scattering with and without dilution. Experimental results show that Nafion is a strong stabilizing agent, increasing the ink stability and decreasing the particle size of carbon aggregates. The beneficial effects of Nafion are independent of its concentration and are observed even at Nafion volume fractions of 10 wt%. The interaction energy is found to be a strong function of the surface potential for the dispersion medium with a higher dielectric constant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".