Two-Phase Flow Through Square and Circular Microchannels: Effect of Channel Geometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An adiabatic experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of channel geometry on gas-liquid two-phase flow characteristics in microchannels. A mixture of water and nitrogen gas was pumped through a 96 μm × 96 μm square microchannel and the flow pattern, void fraction and pressure drop data were obtained and compared with those previously obtained in a 100 μm circular microchannel. The frictional pressure drop was determined from the measured total pressure drop, and the two-phase flow pattern and void fraction were determined from image analysis of the video recordings. In the square channel, 136 runs were performed over a range of 0.09 ≤ jG,AVG ≤ 62 m/s for the average superficial gas velocity and 0.01 ≤ jL ≤ 4 m/s for the superficial liquid velocity. The frictional pressure drop data showed that the calculations based on a separated–flow model were best at estimating the frictional pressure drop for both microchannels. No particular effect of the channel shape was found for the two-phase frictional pressure drop. The void fraction-to-volumetric quality relationship was also found to be similar for both shapes of microchannels, exhibiting an exponential increase in void fraction with increasing volumetric quality. The empirical correlation that describes the void fraction-to-volumetric quality relationship for the square microchannel was developed earlier from the measured data for the circular microchannel. Observations of the recorded images indicated the two-phase flow patterns to be primarily intermittent with liquid and gas slugs. The liquid film surrounding the gas core displayed a smooth or ring-like structure. The probability of each interfacial structure occurring was examined in detail to develop a novel flow pattern map consisting of four regions named slug-ring flow, ring-slug flow, multiple flow and semiannular flow. Between the square and circular microchannels, the two-phase flow maps exhibited transition boundaries that were shifted depending on the channel shape. The region of ring-slug flow that appears in the circular microchannel collapsed in the square microchannel, possibly due to the suppression of the liquid-ring film in the corners of the square channel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".