The Role of Global Actors in the Liberalization of Indonesian Economy through its Financial Institutions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In contrast, the political ideology governing on Indonesia seemed to be isolated from any required economic reform. This paper investigates the dynamic role of global actors after liberalization of Indonesian Economy. However, these global actors such as World Bank, International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Trade Organization (WTO), a group of twenty largest economies called as G 20 and Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) play an important role in developed and under developed countries of the world. The international market exercises its rules to regulate any new and existing business including the international business market that is free to enter in this globalization era, with a campaign that aims to benefit all people as the effect trickles down. However, it has been questioned why Indonesia extended this commitment, despite the country still suffering from its own foreign loans that floated up to USD 251.2 billion at the end of 2012.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it