Wet and Dry Deposition of Water-Soluble Inorganic Ions, in Particular Reactive Nitrogen Species, to Haliburton Forest
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Open and throughfall precipitation samples were collected at Haliburton Forest for a total of nine events from July – November of 2009. The following species were analyzed quantitatively: NO3-, SO42-, Cl-, HCOO-, C2O42-, NH4+, Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+. Wet deposition inputs to the system were quantified and the sources of wet-deposited species were probed. The throughfall method was employed to quantify inputs to the forest floor and probe canopy-precipitation interactions. Leaf wash samples at three heights aided in the interpretation of throughfall data and allowed for an examination of vertical profiles of dry deposition to the canopy. Results suggest possible nitrate foliar leaching during the growing season, although this appears to cease during senescence. This finding supports previous evidence that Haliburton Forest has shifted from nitrogen-limitation toward nitrogen-saturation and estimated total atmospheric N inputs to the system are close to the proposed critical load of 10 kg N ha-1 yr-1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".