MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2604515823 · doi:10.2118/185332-ms

Mitigation of Mineral Scale Deposition in Well-Bore and Flow Lines with Eco Friendly and Less Aggressive Chemical

2017· article· en· W2604515823 on OpenAlexaff
M. A. Siddiqui, Mohammad Al-Othman, Naser Al-Houti, S.. Aloun, B. S. Al-Matar, T.. Stanitzek, Corine De Wolf, G. N. Iwenjora

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Oil and Gas India Conference and Exhibition · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis
Canadian institutionsAkzoNobel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWellheadWellboreWorkoverPetroleum engineeringDeposition (geology)Environmentally friendlyEnvironmental scienceCompletion (oil and gas wells)Scale (ratio)Flow (mathematics)DrillingOil fieldProduction (economics)GeologyEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract With the onset of water production, mineral scale deposition appears in the oil and gas wells. The scale deposition in wellbores and flow lines is a universal challenge that has to be addressed with technical and economical effectiveness. Efforts are ongoing to effectively inhibit the scales or remove them through chemical or mechanical means. Kuwait Oil Company is planning to improve the production to 4.0 MM BOPD by the year 2020. In this pursuit, all the possible efforts are made to increase production including application of new technology in drilling, completion, well production and facilities. One of the key aspects of production improvement from individual wells is to avoid any obstruction in the wellbore, wellhead and flow lines that might affect the smooth flow of hydrocarbons. This includes the augmented steps on eliminating mineral deposition from wellbore and flow lines. The wells are suffering from frequent scale deposition in wellbore and flow lines. Usually these problems are mitigated by using strong acid. However, due to maturing of field the wells are generally completed with ESPs. When acids like HCl are used, these ESPs are corroded severely adding extra cost of workover and production loss. This challenge is driving the operators to use less aggressive chemicals that remain environmentally friendly and can maintain the integrity of submersible pumps, metallurgy of the flow lines and other components. To meet this challenge, various chemicals were evaluated through laboratory tests and case histories. The chemical composed of Glutamic acid was selected for the first pilot. The pieces of tubular and other well components suffering from scale deposition were tested in the lab and the results were found to be highly encouraging. Based on this a pilot campaign was initiated with a batch of eight wells to treat wellbore and flow lines. All the treatments were found highly successful. Due to this treatment, the daily production has been improved to 5,000 BOPD without any extra activity such as replacement of ESP or flow line tubing due to corrosion. The paper presents the technology evaluation process, lab testing and field trial results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Oil and Gas India Conference and ExhibitionSame topicEnvironmental Chemistry and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207