MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2604610685

Bivariate Log Location-Scale Model For Interval-Censored Data

2014· article· en· W2604610685 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ruili Li

Bibliographic record

VenueoURspace (University of Regina) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicSpatial and Panel Data Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFaculty of Graduate Studies and Research, University of Alberta
KeywordsBivariate analysisScale (ratio)StatisticsInterval (graph theory)EconometricsMathematicsLog-linear modelComputer scienceGeographyCartographyLinear modelCombinatorics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Censored data is very common in survival analyses and experimental observations. In this thesis, I consider a selected bivariate model concerning censored data. I rst review three basic univariate models, leading to corresponding bivariate models, in more complicated forms. Also I will discuss the properties of an actual, selected bi- variate model with interval-censored data. Then, I would like to derive the likelihood form for bivariate data, and give the maximum-likelihood estimation of the parame- ters. At last, the results of some simulation work, using R, will be showed to verify whether my estimation method is good.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueoURspace (University of Regina)Same topicSpatial and Panel Data AnalysisFrench-language works237,207