Case 2: A 14-year-old girl with oral and genital ulcers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 14-year-old girl of Lebanese descent presented with a one-year history of intermittent, painful vulvar ulcers. The patient denied prodromal symptoms or vaginal discharge, and she had never been sexually active. The history was also remarkable for painless oral ulcers recurring every month, a three-month history of headaches and occasional upper abdominal pain. Before presentation, she was treated for conjunctivitis with antibiotic drops. She gave no history of visual disturbances, ocular pain, rashes or arthritis. The review of systems was otherwise negative, and her history was noncontributory. Initial examination revealed a well-appearing, afebrile, adolescent girl with two minor (<10 mm) oral ulcers on her tongue and two minor, healing, genital ulcers on her left labium majus. Her general physical examination was otherwise normal. She was found to have bilateral papillitis and panuveitis on a screening ophthalmological examination. Her complete blood counts were normal. Her inflammatory markers were elevated: her erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 54 mm/h (normal 1 mm/h to 10 mm/h) and her C-reactive protein was 190 nmol/L (normal 0 nmol/L to 76 nmol/L). Electrolyte levels, renal function and liver enzyme levels were normal. An infectious work-up was negative, which included testing for herpes simplex virus among other sexually transmitted infections. A screening rheumatological work-up was negative, including antinuclear antibody for systemic lupus erythematosus, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody for vasculitis, and serum calcium and angiotensin-converting enzyme for sarcoidosis. A urinalysis was positive for trace ketones and 1+ protein, and negative for blood, nitrites and leukocytes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head and orbits revealed bilateral, nonspecific, scattered small foci of abnormal signal in the bifrontal white matter but no abnormal enhancement of the optic nerves. A cerebral angiogram and lumbar puncture were normal. Behçet disease is a relapsing inflammatory disorder with multi-system involvement. Oral and genital ulcers with uveitis were once considered the classical signs, but the disease can involve the neurological, musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal and vascular systems (1,2). The geographical origins of this disease are largely located along the historical route of the Silk Road from Japan to the eastern edge of the Mediterranean Sea. Genetic factors play an important role in the development of Behçet disease, with environmental factors playing a supplemental role. The diagnosis relies on clinical criteria rather than laboratory tests (Table 1) (3), but these have not yet been validated in children. Diagnostic criteria for Behçet disease* For the diagnosis to be made, a patient must exhibit recurrent oral ulceration plus at least two of the other findings in the absence of other clinical explanations Diagnostic criteria for Behçet disease* For the diagnosis to be made, a patient must exhibit recurrent oral ulceration plus at least two of the other findings in the absence of other clinical explanations In paediatric studies, the most common initial presentation of Behçet disease is oral ulceration. However, the clinical features can be easily misdiagnosed and may not present until the disease evolves over time. Various etiologies must be carefully considered, and important differential diagnoses of orogenital ulceration include immunological, gastrointestinal, dermatological, infectious, hematological and medication-related causes (Table 2) (4). The patient initially presented with nonsexually related oral and genital ulcers, and it was the screening ophthalmological examination that prompted the diagnosis of Behçet disease. Within the framework of orogenital ulceration and panuveitis, the diagnostic possibilities become more limited. Differential diagnosis of orogenital ulceration HLA Human leukocyte antigen Differential diagnosis of orogenital ulceration HLA Human leukocyte antigen The clinical features of Behçet disease can be diverse (3,5). Although recurrent oral ulceration is required for diagnosis, up to 3% of patients can experience other features of the disease without having oral ulceration (3). When present, these oral ulcers are small, round, painful and erythematous, and can present anywhere in the mouth. They recur at various intervals and generally heal without scarring. The genital ulcers are also painful, but they are deeper and may leave scarring. They usually occur on the labia in females and on the scrotum in males. The patient presented with a history of painless oral ulcers, which is not typical for the oral ulceration associated with Behçet disease. Skin lesions tend to occur in more than 90% of children and include erythema nodosum, acneiform lesions, folliculitis and purpura (6). Neither rash nor pathergy (Table 1) were present in our patient. Ocular involvement can occur in up to 61% of cases, is most often bilateral and affects boys more than girls. Panuveitis and posterior uveitis are more common, but isolated anterior uveitis and intermediate uveitis can also occur. Corneal ulceration, cystoid macular degeneration, papillitis, retinal vasculitis, retinal detachment and retrobulbar neuritis are rare events. Central nervous system disease has been reported in 10% to 20% of children with Behçet disease and includes meningoencephalitis, encephalomyelitis, benign intracranial hypertension and organic psychiatric disturbances (5,6). Arthritis is common, affecting 50% to 75% of children and is most often oligoarticular in distribution. Vascular involvement in Behçet disease is unique in that it is the only vasculitis affecting both the arterial and venous systems. In children, vascular disease is rare but also a major cause of morbidity and mortality (2,5). Uncommon manifestations in children include gastrointestinal, renal and cardiac disease. There is no curative treatment for Behçet disease. The goal is to prevent organ damage and control acute exacerbations. Topical corticosteroids are the first line of treatment for oral and genital ulcers and also ocular inflammation (2). Oral colchicine, dapsone and azathioprine have been used to treat Behçet disease, but a course of systemic steroids is sometimes required during acute flares. Although bilateral papillitis was detected on initial screening ophthalmological examination, optic nerve involvement and central nervous system inflammation were excluded in the patient with neuroimaging, cerebral angiography and lumbar puncture. She was treated with topical corticosteroid eye drops and oral colchicine with good response. At 18 months follow-up after disease onset, the patient continues to be in disease remission on oral colchicine alone. The differential diagnosis of orogenital ulcerations is extensive, including immunological, gastrointestinal, dermatological, infectious, hematological and medication-related etiologies. The clinical features of Behçet disease can be easily misdiagnosed and may only be recognized as the disease evolves over time; longitudinal follow-up of patients with orogenital ulceration is essential. An ophthalmological examination must be performed in patients presenting with oral and genital ulceration, and consideration must be given to a possible diagnosis of Behçet disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".