MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2604707936

Kinkeeping and Caregiving: Contributions of Older People in Immigrant Families*

2004· article· en· W2604707936 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Comparative Family Studies · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration and Labor Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomelandImmigrationVisitor patternGlobeSociologyGender studiesEconomic growthPsychologyPolitical sciencePolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many immigrant families in the U.S. contain transnational older people who maintain loyalties to their homeland and to the homes of their American children. These dual commitments give rise to a unique life style among seniors who move between kin in different countries and continents. Because the overwhelming majority of older people around the globe are content to in place, that is, to grow old in the place where they have lived out their lives (Longino, 1994), these foreign-born seniors must be regarded as remarkable. What unifies them is their willingness to relocate (at least temporarily) in old age to the distant country and foreign culture that younger family members call home. In terms of origins and personal biography, the transnational elderly are admittedly diverse. They are men and women, married and widowed, prosperous and poor, sophisticated and provincial. What unites them is the life style of family caregiving detailed in this paper. Transnational older people carry out caregiving responsibilities in two or more countries-their homeland, the U.S., and wherever else children or other close relations have settled. Wherever they hail from, and whether they come to the U.S. as a temporary visitor or as a permanent resident, they share a common experience as elderly newcomers. They share both their desire to be close to their U.S.-based children and their longing for faraway people and places (Treas and Mazumdar, 2002). Their experiences are shaded by the realities of old age. Declines in health, energy, and functioning threaten their travel between countries, their accommodation to American culture, and their ability to be of use to kin.Their contributions to kin are substantial. Older parents' kin-keeping and caregiving make possible their children's participation in the American economy and society. Most are family re-unification immigrants, petitioned and sponsored by children who are U.S. citizens and can afford to support them. However, even older immigrants who live permanently in the U.S. travel to their home villages to visit and help out family members who remain behind (Treas and Mazumdar, 2002). Returning from their birthplaces, they nurture family ties by sharing news and photos of distant kin with their U.S.-based relatives. Those who cannot immigrate have come on a six-month visitor's visa to celebrate the weddings and graduations of their U.S.-based grandchildren or to lend a hand with family affairs. In the face of a global diaspora of professional workers from less developed countries, some elderly people establish a pattern of seasonal migration between the residences of grown children. This transnational lifestyle is a new phenomenon, because circular migration over long distances was unthinkable, especially for old people, before the advent of inexpensive air travel.Older members in transnational families demonstrate a complex blend of practical caregiving activities and symbolic kin-keeping. The practical aspects involve the domestic duties necessary to maintain a household and care for children and the sick. By symbolic kinkeeping, we refer to activities that go beyond any functional requirement to keep families together, such as arranging family gatherings, marking birthdays, mediating conflicts, and disseminating news of kin. Symbolic kin-keeping preserves the meaning of kin relationships through activities that conserve ethnic culture, celebrate religious values, pass on unifying family stories, and share treasured recipes. This symbolic kin-keeping may take on special importance for older transnational persons, because they depend on younger immigrants whose very incorporation into American society may threaten customary understandings and traditional practices of elder care.For families separated by great distance and national boundaries, carework and kinkeeping by older people becomes an essential medium for reinforcing personal relationships, affirming the primacy of kin ties, and sustaining mutual obligations. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score0.976

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it