MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2604707936

Kinkeeping and Caregiving: Contributions of Older People in Immigrant Families*

2004· article· en· W2604707936 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Comparative Family Studies · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueMigration and Labor Dynamics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHomelandImmigrationVisitor patternGlobeSociologyGender studiesEconomic growthPsychologyPolitical sciencePolitics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Many immigrant families in the U.S. contain transnational older people who maintain loyalties to their homeland and to the homes of their American children. These dual commitments give rise to a unique life style among seniors who move between kin in different countries and continents. Because the overwhelming majority of older people around the globe are content to in place, that is, to grow old in the place where they have lived out their lives (Longino, 1994), these foreign-born seniors must be regarded as remarkable. What unifies them is their willingness to relocate (at least temporarily) in old age to the distant country and foreign culture that younger family members call home. In terms of origins and personal biography, the transnational elderly are admittedly diverse. They are men and women, married and widowed, prosperous and poor, sophisticated and provincial. What unites them is the life style of family caregiving detailed in this paper. Transnational older people carry out caregiving responsibilities in two or more countries-their homeland, the U.S., and wherever else children or other close relations have settled. Wherever they hail from, and whether they come to the U.S. as a temporary visitor or as a permanent resident, they share a common experience as elderly newcomers. They share both their desire to be close to their U.S.-based children and their longing for faraway people and places (Treas and Mazumdar, 2002). Their experiences are shaded by the realities of old age. Declines in health, energy, and functioning threaten their travel between countries, their accommodation to American culture, and their ability to be of use to kin.Their contributions to kin are substantial. Older parents' kin-keeping and caregiving make possible their children's participation in the American economy and society. Most are family re-unification immigrants, petitioned and sponsored by children who are U.S. citizens and can afford to support them. However, even older immigrants who live permanently in the U.S. travel to their home villages to visit and help out family members who remain behind (Treas and Mazumdar, 2002). Returning from their birthplaces, they nurture family ties by sharing news and photos of distant kin with their U.S.-based relatives. Those who cannot immigrate have come on a six-month visitor's visa to celebrate the weddings and graduations of their U.S.-based grandchildren or to lend a hand with family affairs. In the face of a global diaspora of professional workers from less developed countries, some elderly people establish a pattern of seasonal migration between the residences of grown children. This transnational lifestyle is a new phenomenon, because circular migration over long distances was unthinkable, especially for old people, before the advent of inexpensive air travel.Older members in transnational families demonstrate a complex blend of practical caregiving activities and symbolic kin-keeping. The practical aspects involve the domestic duties necessary to maintain a household and care for children and the sick. By symbolic kinkeeping, we refer to activities that go beyond any functional requirement to keep families together, such as arranging family gatherings, marking birthdays, mediating conflicts, and disseminating news of kin. Symbolic kin-keeping preserves the meaning of kin relationships through activities that conserve ethnic culture, celebrate religious values, pass on unifying family stories, and share treasured recipes. This symbolic kin-keeping may take on special importance for older transnational persons, because they depend on younger immigrants whose very incorporation into American society may threaten customary understandings and traditional practices of elder care.For families separated by great distance and national boundaries, carework and kinkeeping by older people becomes an essential medium for reinforcing personal relationships, affirming the primacy of kin ties, and sustaining mutual obligations. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,290
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,976

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,041
Tête enseignante GPT0,372
Écart entre enseignants0,331 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle