Thermal plumes in viscoplastic fluids: flow onset and development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purely conductive state in configurations such as the Rayleigh–Bénard one is linearly stable for yield stress fluids at all Rayleigh numbers, $Ra$ . However, on changing to localized heater configurations the static background state exists only if the yield stress is sufficiently large. Otherwise, thermal plumes may be induced in a stationary viscoplastic fluid layer, as illustrated in the recent experimental study of Davaille et al. ( J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. , vol. 193, 2013, 144–153). Here, we study an analogous problem both analytically and computationally, from the perspective of an ideal yield stress fluid (Bingham fluid) that is initially stationary in a locally heated rectangular tank. We show that for a non-zero yield stress the onset of flow waits for a start time $t_{s}$ that increases with the dimensionless ratio of yield stress to buoyancy stress, denoted $B$ . We provide a precise mathematical definition of $t_{s}$ and approximately evaluate this for different values of $B$ , using both computational and semianalytical methods. For sufficiently large $B\geqslant B_{cr}$ , the fluid is unable to yield. For the flow studied, $B_{cr}\approx 0.00307$ . The critical value $B_{cr}$ and the start time $t_{s}$ , for $B<B_{cr}$ , are wholly independent of $Ra$ and $Pr$ . For $B<B_{cr}$ , yielding starts at $t=t_{s}$ . The flow develops into either a weakly or a strongly convective flow. In the former case the passage to a steady state is relatively smooth and monotone, resulting eventually in a steady convective plume above the heater, rising and impinging on the upper wall, then recirculating steadily around the tank. With strongly convecting flows, for progressively larger $Ra$ we observe an increasing number of distinct plume heads and a tendency for plumes to develop as short-lived pulses. Over a certain range of $(Ra,B)$ the flow becomes temporarily frozen between two consecutive pulses. Such characteristics are distinctly reminiscent of the experimental work of Davaille et al. ( J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. , vol. 193, 2013, 144–153). The yield stress plays a multifaceted role here as it affects plume temperature, size and velocity through different mechanisms. On the one hand, increasing $B$ tends to increase the maximum temperature of the plume heads. On the other hand, for larger $B\rightarrow B_{cr}$ , the plume never starts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".