Collapse Fragility Analysis of Non-Seismically Designed Bridge Columns Retrofitted with FRP Composites
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The seismic fragility assessment of the bridge can be analyzed using fragility curves which is a method to estimate the probability of damage of the structure at a specific level of ground motion or an intensity measure (IM). The columns are the most vulnerable structural element in the bridges which have a significant contribution to the failure probability of the bridge system. This research presents the collapse fragility curves of non-seismically designed circular reinforced concrete (RC) bridge columns using different combination of parameters located in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Probabilistic seismic demand models are produced using the results obtained from the incremental dynamic analyses. Considering collapse drift as a demand parameter, fragility curves are generated with different parameters of non-seismically designed circular RC bridge columns. It is observed that amount of reinforcement, shear span-depth ratio, and axial load are significantly affect the collapse fragility curve of the retrofitted bridge columns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it