MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2604868053 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.732873

Alcohol use disorder and depression: proposed rewording of Choosing Wisely recommendation

2017· letter· en· W2604868053 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Robert L. Tanguay, Wiplove Lamba, Ronald Fraser, Phillip Mills, Ataa Azarbar, Nady el‐Guebaly

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2017
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsAlberta HealthAlberta Health ServicesPacific Centre for Reproductive MedicineCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity of British ColumbiaNova Scotia HospitalDalhousie UniversityMcGill University Health CentreAlberta Gambling Research InstituteSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepression (economics)Alcohol use disorderMedicinePsychiatryComputer scienceAlcoholChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter is in response to a specific recommendation of the Choosing Wisely campaign.[1][1] The following is a direct quote: > Don’t routinely prescribe antidepressants as firstline treatment for depression comorbid with an active alcohol use disorder without first considering the possibility

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.076
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.076
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0760.060
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.212
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association Journal→Same topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life→French-language works237,207→