Verification of 24-h Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts over the Pacific Northwest from a High-Resolution Ensemble Kalman Filter System
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) has recently developed an experimental high-resolution EnKF (HREnKF) regional ensemble prediction system, which it tested over the Pacific Northwest of North America for the first half of February 2011. The HREnKF has 2.5-km horizontal grid spacing and assimilates surface and upper-air observations every hour. To determine the benefits of the HREnKF over less expensive alternatives, its 24-h quantitative precipitation forecasts are compared with those from a lower-resolution (15 km) regional ensemble Kalman filter (REnKF) system and to ensembles directly downscaled from the REnKF using the same grid as the HREnKF but with no additional data assimilation (DS). The forecasts are verified against rain gauge observations and gridded precipitation analyses, the latter of which are characterized by uncertainties of comparable magnitude to the model forecast errors. Nonetheless, both deterministic and probabilistic verification indicates robust improvements in forecast skill owing to the finer grids of the HREnKF and DS. The HREnKF exhibits a further improvement in performance over the DS in the first few forecast hours, suggesting a modest positive impact of data assimilation. However, this improvement is not statistically significant and may be attributable to other factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it