MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2604922481 · doi:10.18280/mmep.040103

Effect of ambient condition on n-heptane droplet evaporation

2017· article· en· W2604922481 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jigang Wang, Xiaorong Wang, Kai Xiang

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJiangsu University of Science and TechnologyJiangsu UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsHeptaneEvaporationMaterials scienceThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the theory of heat and mass transfer, an evaporation model for single droplet in the convection heat air environment was established. By comparing the experimental data, the correctness of the model was verified. The effects of the initial droplet diameter, ambient temperature, ambient pressure and flow intensity on the n-heptane droplet evaporation characteristics was analyzed. The results showed that ambient temperature, ambient pressure and flow intensity has a great influence on the n-heptane droplet evaporation, and the ambient temperature is the main factor, when the ambient temperature increased from 400K to 600K, the droplet lifetime decreased from 44ms to 6.5ms, shortened by 85.23%. Ambient temperature and flow intensity can accelerate n-heptane droplet evaporation, but the evaporation time was extended with the increase of the ambient pressure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques InnovationFrench-language works237,207