Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Marriage between immigrants and natives can be regarded as a measurement of assimilation and integration. The present analysis of inter-marriage in Germany refers to the choice of partner. In contrast to other studies which are based on current occurence of binational partnerships, the effects of selection which stem from the different length of duration of partnerships in dependence of the choice of partner can be avoided. Furthermore, the present analysis considers not only marital relationships but also the non-marital choice of partner. The analysis relies on official data as well as on survey data. Summarizing the major results, German/foreign choice of partner can according to the respective nationalities be subdivided into three types: (1) the neighbouring nationalities, (2) the large national groups in Germany (especially the nations of guest workers) and (3) the nationalities in respect to which binational choice of partner cannot be explained by physical closeness. Inter-marriage according to type I and 2 are characterized by parameters of social structure such as sex ration and the size of the foreign population, whereas in the latter case individual aspects are the decisive factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it