MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MODELO CALGARY DE AVALIAÇÃO FAMILIAR: AVALIAÇÃO DE FAMÍLIAS COM INDIVÍDUOS ADOECIDOS DE TUBERCULOSE

2017· article· pt· W2604972281 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thaís Cristina Flexa Souza, Adriana Borges Melo, Carla Monique Lavareda Costa, Jacira Nunes Carvalho

Bibliographic record

VenueEnfermagem em Foco · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth Education and Validation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesFamily healthMedicinePhilosophyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objetivo: avaliar famílias com membros em tratamento de tuberculose por meio do Modelo Calgary de Avaliação de Família (MCAF). Metodologia: estudo do tipo descritivo-exploratório no qual participaram duas unidades familiares possuindo um membro em tratamento de tuberculose, ambas cadastradas em uma Estratégia Saúde da Família em Belém, no Pará. Para a aplicação do Modelo, foi realizada a técnica de entrevista semiestruturada e uso de genograma e ecomapa. Resultados: após a avaliação de família realizada conforme Modelo Calgary de Avaliação de Família, resultaram duas famílias, sendo uma monoparental, liderada pela mulher, e a outra alargada; em ambas, o membro adoecido é o provedor de questões econômicas e as famílias, pesquisadas possuem relacionamentos e vínculos com algumas instituições de saúde, religiosas, escolares e até grupos de apoio social. Conclusões: o Modelo Calgary de Avaliação de Família mostrou ser eficaz como uma nova estratégia de avaliação, contribuindo para o planejamento de cuidados de famílias em qualquer nível de atenção à saúde.Descritores: Enfermagem de família, Atenção Primária à Saúde, Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar.CALGARY MODEL OF FAMILY EVALUATION: EVALUATION OF FAMILIES WITH INDIVIDUALS SICKENED WITH TUBERCULOSISObjective: Evaluating family members in treatment of Tuberculosis through the Calgary Model of Family Evaluation (CMFE). Methodology: Descriptive-exploratory type study, in which two family units having a member in treatment of tuberculosis participated, both registered in a Family Health Strategy, Belém, Pará. For the application of the Model, the technique of semi-structured interview was perfomed and utilization of genogram and eco-map. Results: After the evaluation of the family was performed according to Calgary Model of Family Evaluation resulted in two families, one being a mono-parental headed by the woman and the other expended, in both cases the sick member is the provider of economic matters and the families researched have ties and relationships some health institutions, religious, school and even social support groups. Conclusions: The Calgary Model of Family Evaluation shows to be effective as a new evaluation strategy, contributing to the family planning care at any level of health care.Descriptors: Family Nursing, Primary Health Care, Home Care Services.MODELO CALGARY DE EVALUACIÓN DE LA FAMILIA: EVALUACIÓN DE FAMILIA CON INDIVIDUOS ENFERMADOS DE TUBERCULOSISObjetivo: Evaluar familia de miembros en el tratamiento de la tuberculosis por medio del Modelo Calgary de Evaluación de la Familia (MCEF). Metodología: Estudio de exploración de tipo descriptivo, participaran dos unidades familiares que tienen un elemento en el tratamiento de la tuberculosis, ambas registradas en una Estrategia de Salud Familiar, Belém, Pará. Para a aplicación do Modelo, fue usada la técnica de entrevista semiestructurada y utilización del genograma y eco-mapa. Resultados: Después de la evaluación de la familia realizado de acuerdo con Modelo Calgary de Evaluación de la Familia resultaron dos familias, una siendo mono parental liderada por la mujer y otra extendida, en los dos el miembro enfermo es el proveedor de los recursos económicos y las familias investigadas tienen relaciones y vínculos con algunas instituciones de salud, religiosas y escolares, hasta grupos de apoyo social. Conclusiones: El Modelo Calgary de Evaluación de la Familia se muestreó ser eficaz como una nueva estrategia de evaluación contribuyendo para el planificación de cuidados familiares en cualquier nivel de atención a la salud.Descriptores: Enfermería de la familia, Atención Primaria de Salud, Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.156
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnfermagem em FocoSame topicHealth Education and ValidationFrench-language works237,207