Des exclus en quête de légitimité sociale : l’exemple de l’« habitat du pauvre » dans la France contemporaine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La plupart des pays développés possèdent à leur marge des ensembles d’habitat urbain accueillant exclusivement des populations aux ressources très précaires. Depuis la fin des années cinquante, en France, les politiques sociales du logement ont cherché à créer des formes résidentielles combinant l’accueil des populations les plus pauvres et le respect des normes jugées élémentaires en matière d’hygiène et de confort, en vue d’assurer la « promotion » sociale de leurs habitants. L’article explore quelques exemples de nouvelles formes d’« habitat du pauvre » aménagées par les politiques sociales urbaines. Il en analyse un des effets les plus fréquents : la désagrégation du lien communautaire, le déploiement de rapports de compétition agressive, de disqualification réciproque et de violence mutuelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".