MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Ticklish Problem

2017· article· en· W2605011095 on OpenAlexaff
Marius A. Tirlea, Shahin Tavakoli, Davide Pigoli, John A. D. Aston

Bibliographic record

VenueSignificance · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsFavouriteArt historyComputer scienceHistoryPhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The book Mr. Tickle is a childhood favourite for many. But this fantastical story of a man with “extraordinary long arms” is helping statisticians derive a more realistic understanding of the differences in regional accents. By Marius A. Tirlea, Shahin Tavakoli, Davide Pigoli and John A. D. Aston

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.514

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.017
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1540.040

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSignificanceSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207