MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2605027696 · doi:10.1214/16-aoas1002

Electricity price dependence in New York State zones: A robust detrended correlation approach

2017· article· en· W2605027696 on OpenAlexaff
Debbie J. Dupuis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Annals of Applied Statistics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Power System Optimization
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconometricsElectricityDetrended fluctuation analysisGridEstimatorElectricity priceComputer scienceEconomicsStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cost of electricity varies across the zones of the New York State electric system. While fair and open access to the electrical grid is sought, we show that residents currently do not equally benefit, or suffer, from price changes. Upcoming major investments in the grid offer an opportunity to rectify these inequalities, but only if we understand the price-change propagation dynamics for the current underlying infrastructure. We study these dynamics, estimating the partial correlations between changes in electricity prices in connected zones. We develop and investigate a robust exponentially weighted correlation estimator that performs well in the presence of electricity price spikes and can track a rapidly changing time-varying correlation. We show that price-change partial correlations are mostly positive, but can also be negative, and provide new insight into price-change dynamics within the grid that cannot be extracted from the price-setting algorithm or obtained from available transmission capability data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Annals of Applied StatisticsSame topicElectric Power System OptimizationFrench-language works237,207