MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2605056900

Regional Assessment of Agricultural Residues for Bioenergy Production in Ghana

2014· article· en· W2605056900 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Francis Kemausuor, Evans Yakah, Andreas Kamp

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnergy and Environment Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPer capitaAgricultural economicsAgriculturePopulationGeographyConsumption (sociology)ElectricityLatin AmericansChinaStandard of livingDeveloping countryEnvironmental protectionBusinessEconomic growthEconomicsEngineeringPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. INTRODUCTIONEnergy is an important component of socio-economic development (Carley et al., 2011). In every country of the world, energy is needed to provide a range of services including, but not limited to, lighting, heating, cooking, and ensuring mobility. Industrial development cannot happen without access to energy. It has been shown by the Human Development Index (HDI) that access to energy somewhat matches extent of economic growth of a country (Chontanawat et al., 2008). Per capita energy consumption is highest in those countries and regions that are regarded as most developed. These include the United States, Canada, Japan, Europe, China and other notable countries in Asia and Latin America. The countries/regions with the least development are also the regions with the lowest per capita energy consumption. Majority of countries in Sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia fall into this category. For example, per capita electricity consumption in sub-Saharan Africa [minus South Africa] was 180 kWh in 2010 compared to a world average of 2500 kWh (Bazilian et al., 2012). Only about 31% of the population in sub-Saharan Africa has access to electricity (Suberu et al., 2013). Apart from poor access to electricity, there is also poor access to modern fuels for cooking and heating. Close to 80% of the population in sub-Saharan Africa still rely on woodfuel for cooking and heating (Prasad, 2011) due to a lack of access to modern fuels such as Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LGP) and Natural Gas. This has implications for forestry as rural households resort to the use of charcoal and firewood, which are sourced from or processed from forestry resources.Many of the countries that do not have high access to energy services often rely on expensive energy imports that weighs negatively on their trade balance and leave little for other infrastructural developmental. To curb this situation and to advance home grown fuels, renewable energy has emerged as an alternative source of energy that is promoted globally. Technologies for assessing renewable energy may have higher start-up costs but levelised costs keep decreasing as efficiencies improve. Among the more popular renewable energy sources are solar energy, wind energy and biomass energy. For many countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), biomass energy is already the most consumed energy source but comes in traditional forms, such as firewood and charcoal. Advancement in technology has provided an opportunity to modernize biomass into cleaner energy carriers, such as liquid biofuels or biogas for transportation, cooking and electricity generation. To meet increasing demand for energy as well as ensure a low carbon future, it is anticipated that renewable energy forms, including modern biomass energy will be integrated into the global energy mix. For most developing countries with high agricultural potentials, the idea of modernizing biomass, especially for application in rural communities, is one that sounds very appealing. Residues from crop production, which come at virtually no cost to rural communities, can be used for the generation of electricity to address rural lighting challenges or to produce biogas to decrease the reliance on traditional biomass. Decreasing traditional biomass use is especially desirable because it has the potential to reduce deforestation. Large-scale deployment of modern biomass energy (which could also mean a lot of small-scale deployment in several rural communities) may help diversify fuel supply in many situations, which in turn may lead to a more secure energy supply with important environmental benefits (Fernandes and Costa, 2010). Like many other developing countries, Ghana is also seeking to become more sustainable in its use of energy resources. In this regard, the country is planning to increase the use of renewable energy in its energy mix. Already biomass dominates the energy mix but it is used in unsustainable combustion routes with very low conversion efficiencies. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy and Environment ImpactsFrench-language works237,207