MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SUBSISTENCE PATTERNS OF POPULATION OF THE LOWER OB RIVER BASIN DURING THE ENEOLITHIC (BASED ON FAUNAL REMAINS OF THE SETTLEMENT OF GORNIY SAMOTNEL-1)

2017· article· en· W2605073658 on OpenAlexaff
Tatiana Nomokonova, Robert J. Losey, Olga Sergeevna Tupakhina, Daniel Sergeevich Tupakhin

Bibliographic record

VenueVestnik arheologii, antropologii i ètnografii · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubsistence agricultureChalcolithicSettlement (finance)ArchaeologyGeographyHuman settlementPopulationStructural basinGeologyPaleontologyDemographyAgricultureBronze Age

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ХОЗЯЙСТВЕННАЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТЬ НАСЕЛЕНИЯ НИЖНЕГО ПРИОБЬЯ В ЭПОХУ ЭНЕОЛИТА (ПО ФАУНИСТИЧЕСКИМ МАТЕРИАЛАМ ПОСЕЛЕНИЯ ГОРНЫЙ САМОТНЁЛ 1) Статья посвящена анализу фаунистических остатков с энеолитического поселения Горный Самотнëл-1 (усредненный возраст от 3060 до 2920 кал.лет до н.э.), расположенного на правом берегу р.Оби в пределах Ямало-Ненецкого автономного округа (66°42'12,2'' с.ш.68°41'12,0'' в.д.).Обсуждаются результаты видового определения костей животных; их количественные показатели; модификация кости в результате эрозии, погрызов хищниками, разделки туш и изготовления орудий; а также соотношение элементов скелетов и возрастные показатели отдельных особей.Полученные данные свидетельствуют о комплексном использовании биологических ресурсов населением территории памятника Горный Самотнëл-1 в эпоху энеолита.Фаунистические реконструкции выполнены с учетом археологического контекста.Также приведены данные о палеодиете по результатам анализа нагара на керамических сосудах.В заключение рассмотрены некоторые образцы мелкой зоо-и

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVestnik arheologii, antropologii i ètnografiiSame topicAncient and Medieval Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207