MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W260514791

Amos Gital's Kippur

2001· article· tr· W260514791 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Florence Jacobowitz

Bibliographic record

VenueCineaction! · 2001
Typearticle
Languagetr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVictorySurpriseGloryTerrorismHistorySpanish Civil WarLawMedia studiesSociologyPolitical sciencePolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the closing credits of Amos Gital's Kippur, his latest work which premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival, the director acknowledges Sam Fuller, signaling Kippur's affinity with Fuller's war movies. (Fuller's The Big Red One was also shot in Israel.) Like Fuller's movies, Gital's film draws from his personal experience with combat and is similarly less concerned with polemics (in the case of Kippur, the enemy is an unseen formidable force, gravely underestimated in terms of their ability) and more a dramatization of the experiential aspects of war--what it feels and looks like, up close. One experiences the brutal shock of the Yom Kippur War by identifying with two young men, Weinraub/Liron Levo and Ruso/Tomer Ruso called to serve on Yom Kippur, October 1973. The Yom Kippur war caught Israel by surprise, and this aspect of being unprepared was intensified by an attack carried out on a number of fronts--the borders with Syria and Egypt. The post-war euphoria of the Six Day War (fought in June 1967), a result of Israel's victory which radically reshaped the map of the state, left the country with a heightened sense of omnipotence and strength. (It is difficult to imagine how Israel, so sensitive and committed to national defense, was ever caught 'off-guard'). The calculation to attack on Yom Kippur, the holiest day of the Jewish year, was based on the knowledge that it is a day which many Israeli's--even the nonobservant--respect as a day of meditation and introspection. Those not in the synagogue take advantage of the holiday to head for an outing, meaning that it would be all the more diffic ult to mobilize the country for a call to war. The film begins with Weinraub walking through completely empty city streets. Liturgical prayers, slowly increasing in volume, inform that it is Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement. Weinraub's presence in the empty streets suggests visually his separation from that world. The protagonists are of an age at the cusp of full adulthood; Weinraub questions social mores and values (he recommends that his friend read Marcuse and attributes his sense of alienation to society's emphasis on consumerism, claiming his secondhand car as a sign of his protest) and at the same time, both young men express a boyish enthusiasm to partake, finally, in actual battle. They are initially excited with the call to serve, pleased to be of the right age and being given the opportunity to put into practice their intense army training (all Israeli youths devote three full years to the army and then are called periodically for reserve duty). The narrative is all about the shock of confronting the wrenching violence of warfare head on. It i s unfamiliar and disorienting and those who witness it close up--at its vortex--are catapulted into a world marked by fear, anxiety, loss and trauma. In this sense Kippur is a form of descent narrative--where one is forced to confront the underside of civilized society. The film's setting--the era of the 70s--is introduced in a sequence which frames Kippur. Paint colours filmed in extreme close-up run and blend into each other, accompanied by the wail of a lonely saxophone on the film's jazz score. Weinraub and a woman are seen making love on a bed, applying various paint colours to each other's bodies as they do so. The sequence is repeated when Weinraub returns at the end of the film, and seems abstracted from the narrative. Instead of advancing the narrative or closing it in a realist sense, this sequence acts to set a tone of modernist contemplation, suggesting the idea of art and creativity as a form of self-expression that is contrasted to the tragic violence of war. The rivulets of paint running together in the closing sequence recall the colours of battle-- the mud, dust, blood, flesh and khaki tones that merge in the battle scenes. This framing device suggests the film's affinity with the tradition of the European art film, which is reiterated in the film's use of style--longer takes, a combination of a detached camera as well as close, hand-held shots, the use of actual locations and a naturalistic acting style and a formal narrative structure in which lengthy battle sequences are interspersed with discussions between characters in their off-duty time, where they voice their fears and concerns. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.859
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCineaction!Same topicJewish and Middle Eastern StudiesFrench-language works237,207