MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A32: Exploring the interplay between nucleotide excision repair and DNA replicative stress

2017· article· en· W2605198678 on OpenAlexaffabout
Elliot Drobetsky, François Bélanger, Jean-Philippe Angers, Émile Fortier, Santiago Costantino, Hugo Würtele

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleotide excision repairDNA damageBiologyDNA repairGenome instabilityCell cycleDNA replicationReplication protein AMolecular biologyCell biologyDNA polymeraseDNAGeneGeneticsDNA-binding protein

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ultraviolet (UV) light causes highly genotoxic DNA lesions that are removed by nucleotide excision repair (NER), and NER is critical for preventing UV-associated skin cancers. UV-induced DNA lesions block the progression of DNA polymerases, leading to replicative stress and genomic instability. Upon UV, the ataxia-telangectasia and rad3 related (ATR) kinase is rapidly activated, leading to cell-cycle arrest, inhibition of replication origin firing, and stabilization of blocked replication forks. Intriguingly, previous data indicated that reduced ATR activity causes profound NER defects specifically in S phase cells. Moreover many model cancer cell lines, including a majority of melanoma lines, present striking S phase-specific NER defects. We used the yeast S. cerevisiae as model to investigate NER activity during S phase. We optimized a novel flow cytometry-based assay to quantify NER as a function of cell cycle in this organism. Using this assay we demonstrate that, as for human cells, deletion of the yeast ATR homolog Mec1 causes NER defects uniquely in S, and that initiation of DNA replication is prerequisite for manifestation of this defect. S phase-specific NER was perturbed by mutations in various genes encoding key DNA damage response factors that regulate, e.g. cell cycle checkpoints, chromatin remodeling, and homologous recombination. Our data also reveal a strong correlation between S phase-specific NER defects and elevated RPA focus formation in mutants that are sensitive to replicative stress. Finally we demonstrate that modulation of RPA levels strongly influences NER activity specifically during S in human cancer cell lines. Overall, our data indicate that mutations in a multitude of DNA damage response pathways cause inordinate sequestration of RPA at stalled replication forks, thereby reducing the availability of this factor to perform its essential role in NER. This has important implications for our understanding of UV-induced skin cancer development in humans. Citation Format: Elliot Drobetsky, François Bélanger, Jean-Philippe Angers, Émile Fortier, Santiago Costantino, Hugo Wurtele. Exploring the interplay between nucleotide excision repair and DNA replicative stress [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on DNA Repair: Tumor Development and Therapeutic Response; 2016 Nov 2-5; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2017;15(4_Suppl):Abstract nr A32.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.585

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer ResearchSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207