Ten years after : a qualitative study of students' experiences in a high school theatre company
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This qualitative study explored 4 former students' perceptions of the learning \nassociated with their involvement in a high school theatre program and the contextual \nfactors they linked to their perceived development. The study involved 4 adult \nparticipants, 2 male and 2 female, who had participated extensively in a high school \ntheatre company from 1996 to 2001 when they were students in a large Ontario school \nboard. Data were collected from January to August, 2007, when the 4 former students \ntook part in two in-depth, open-ended interviews. The focus of investigation was \nparticipant perspectives. \nData analysis revealed that the 4 participants' involvement in high school theatre \nproduced both wide-ranging and enduring developmental benefits across personal, social, \nand cognitive domains. Participants achieved these benefits through interactions among 3 \nrelated contexts: (a) rehearsal and performance practices, (b) the world of the play, and \n(c) characteristics of the high school theatre company.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it