MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2605304639

Callisthenes in Africa : the historian's role at Siwah and in the Proskynesis controversy

2014· article· en· W2605304639 on OpenAlexaff
Frances Pownall

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Classica : Proceedings of the Classical Association of South Africa · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDivinityReflexive pronounPhilosophyScholarshipGreeksPoliticsPilgrimageClassicsEpistemologyHistoryTheologyLawPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the most discussed episodes in modern studies of Alexander is his pilgrimage to the oracle at Siwah, in which Ammon, equated by the Greeks with Zeus, is alleged to have acknowledged his paternity of the young conqueror. Discussion has often centred around the question of the extent to which Alexander himself believed in his own divinity. Earlier scholarship preferred to view Alexander as entirely 'rational' (adopting an apologetic view originally found in Plut. Alex. 28.6 and Arr. An. 7.29.3), refused to accept that Alexander actually thought of himself as a god, and argued that he promoted his divine filiation only for political reasons. The more recent communis opinion, however, has been that Alexander did indeed think of himself as a living god and actively promoted his own deification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.742
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Classica : Proceedings of the Classical Association of South AfricaSame topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207