MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2605308574 · doi:10.1093/pch/8.suppl_a.6a

Prescription medicine use by one million Canadian children

2001· article· en· W2605308574 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical studies and practices
Canadian institutionsWilliam Osler Health System
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedical prescriptionMedicineFamily medicineDrugOff-label usePharmacotherapyPopulationPediatricsDrug Utilization ReviewPsychiatryEnvironmental healthPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drugs are an increasing and integral part of the treatment of childhood conditions. There is widespread concern regarding the inadequacy of paediatric data from clinical trials, which results in limited prescribing information available to support optimal pharmacotherapy for children. One explanation for the limited prescribing information in paediatrics is the perception of relatively infrequent use of drugs in the treatment of childhood conditions. To date there have been few population studies quantifying the extent of prescription drug use among Canadian children. Prescription information from administrative databases were available for over one million paediatric claimants likely representing approximately two million eligible children. Nearly 15% of Canadian children actually had a claim for a prescription drug recorded in this database. Descriptive statistics were employed to describe drug utilization for those who had a drug claim. The two largest therapeutic areas were antibiotics (76% of claimants) and respiratory drugs (18% of claimants). Among the top 20 drugs dispensed to paediatric claimants, 14 were antibiotics and the top drug overall was amoxicillin. Psychotropic drugs defined as stimulants, antidepressants, antipsychotics and anticonvulsants were dispensed to 6% of all paediatric claimants. In virtually every therapeutic area, the usage of drugs differed markedly across age groups. A wide range of drugs are prescribed to children, many of which are being used outside of the age ranges approved by Health Canada. However, most new drugs are used relatively infrequently in children. The large numbers of Canadian children documented in this study using prescription medicines reinforces the value of vigilance in ensuring that physicians are equipped with adequate information to ensure safe and effective prescribing. The use of therapeutic drugs is widespread, and for a large number of these drugs, safety and efficacy among children has not been established, although no conclusions can be drawn from this study about appropriateness of drug therapy in children. Consequently, ongoing vigilance in accurate paediatric labelling as well as future pharmacoepidemiologic studies addressing safety and efficacy are required. Efforts must be concentrated on those specific age ranges in which products or drug classes are used, evidence of which can be determined from actual utilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it