MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2605358558 · doi:10.4000/cadernosaa.1189

I wanna be your punk: o universo de possíveis do punk, do D.I.Y. e das culturas underground

2017· article· pt· W2605358558 on OpenAlexaff
Paula Guerra, Will Straw

Bibliographic record

VenueCadernos de arte e antropologia · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusic History and Culture
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPunkHumanitiesArtArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

So messed up/ I want you here/ In my room/ I want you here/ Now we’re gonna be/ Face-to-face/ And I’ll lay right down/ In my favorite place/ And now I wanna/ Be your dog/ Now I wanna/ Be your dog/ Now I wanna/ Be your dog/ Well c’mon/ Now I’m ready/ To close my eyes/ And now I’m ready/ To close my mind/ And now I’m ready/ To feel your hand/ And lose my heart/ On the burning sands.The Stooges, I Wanna Be Your Dog, 1969. I Wanna Be There Assumimos este editorial sob a forma de trajeto pelos tra...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCadernos de arte e antropologiaSame topicMusic History and CultureFrench-language works237,207