I wanna be your punk: o universo de possíveis do punk, do D.I.Y. e das culturas underground
Bibliographic record
Abstract
So messed up/ I want you here/ In my room/ I want you here/ Now we're gonna be/ Face-to-face/ And I'll lay right down/ In my favorite place/ And now I wanna/ Be your dog/ Now I wanna/ Be your dog/ Now I wanna/ Be your dog/ Well c'mon/ Now I'm ready/ To close my eyes/ And now I'm ready/ To close my mind/ And now I'm ready/ To feel your hand/ And lose my heart/ On the burning sands.The Stooges, I Wanna Be Your Dog, 1969.i wAnnA be theRe Assumimos este editorial sob a forma de trajeto pelos transbordantes possíveis abertos pelo punk.Comecemos pelo seu ideário: o punk avoca-se como uma movimentação contestatária nas dimensões artística, económica e social tornada visível no final dos anos 1970 em Inglaterra.Constituiu-se como uma resposta ao movimento hippie, declarando que este havia fracassado nas suas promessas em termos de metamorfose dos quotidianos juvenis.O diletantismo musical, a vivacidade e a agitação foram (e são) as divisas do movimento.Na sua vertente musical, o ideário punk rejeitou a música reinante nos anos 1970, a indústria da música e os seus procedimentos, as modalidades de divulgação tradicionais, as sonoridades progressivas e a estética padronizada reinante (Guerra 2013(Guerra , 2014)).Foi um movimento próximo do garage rock dos anos 1960, predispondo uma movimentação dos jovens por via da constituição prolífica de bandas, reivindicando para si o do-it-yourself (D.I.Y.).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".