MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2605428180 · doi:10.5705/ss.202016.0222

Gradient-induced Model-free Variable Selection with Composite Quantile Regression

2017· article· en· W2605428180 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStatistica Sinica · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsQuantile regressionStatisticsFeature selectionEconometricsComposite numberVariable (mathematics)Model selectionSelection (genetic algorithm)Regression analysisRegressionQuantileMathematicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Variable selection is central to sparse modeling, and many methods have been proposed under various model assumptions. Most existing methods are based on an explicit functional relationship, while we are concerned with a model-free variable selection method that attempts to identify informative variables that are related to the response by simultaneously examining the sparsity in multiple conditional quantile functions. It does not require specification of the underlying model for the response. The proposed method is implemented via an efficient computing algorithm that couples the majorize-minimization algorithm and the proximal gradient descent algorithm. Its asymptotic estimation and variable selection consistencies are established, without explicit model assumptions, that assure the truly informative variables are correctly identified with high probability. The effectiveness of the proposed method is supported by a variety of simulated and real-life examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.299
Threshold uncertainty score0.757

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it