MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2605491788

Emotions induced by bodily configurations and performance

2008· article· en· W2605491788 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marlène Galdin, Louis Laurencelle

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin de psychologie · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAction Observation and Synchronization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAngerPsychologyHappinessTask (project management)FeelingSocial psychologyCognitive psychologyEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the main results of a study about bodily manipulations designed to increase an individual’s sensitivity to specific emotions and their effects on performance in a precision shooting task with 36 trainee policemen from Quebec. The theories on emotion postulate that there are coherent patterns in the modified behavioural, physiological and experiential responses. According to Hanin (2000), the bond between emotional states (negative and positive) and performance makes up a relatively new field of research requiring an exploratory approach. The “angry” bodily configuration seems to influence the subject’s evaluation of his feeling of anger. The performance seems not to be modified by the posturofacio-respiratory changes (happiness, anger, neutral) which preceded the task of precision shooting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin de psychologieSame topicAction Observation and SynchronizationFrench-language works237,207