La normativité entre proximité democratique et efficacité politique : la question de la subsidiarité dans le droit de l’union européenne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Enfin, dans le dernier article, intitulé « La normativité entre proximité démocratique et efficacité politique - la question de la subsidiarité dans le droit de l’Union européenne », Julien Barroche (Institut d’études politiques de Paris) se penche sur les facteurs explicatifs derrière l’apparition de la notion de subsidiarité en Europe, ainsi que sur le sens politique et les effets pratiques qui en découlent. À cette fin, l’analyse retient comme points d’ancrage trois grands éléments : la distribution des pouvoirs dans les démocraties contemporaines (tensions centre‐périphérie); la polymorphie et l’élasticité conceptuelle; et, enfin, le réinvestissement du principe dans le contexte sociopolitique plus large d’une remise en cause de la légitimité du modèle étatique traditionnel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".