MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2605548990 · doi:10.23907/2012.057

Acute Fatal Peritonitis: A New Organism for Consideration

2012· article· en· W2605548990 on OpenAlexaff
Linda Kocovski, John Fernandes

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademic Forensic Pathology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGut microbiota and health
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAutopsyPeritonitisOrganismPancreatitisCandida albicansPancreasInternal medicineGastroenterologyPathologyPhysiologyIntensive care medicineMicrobiologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 40-year-old man died suddenly and unexpectedly at home. His comorbid conditions included central diabetes insipidus, obesity, and hypertension. Autopsy revealed acute and chronic pancreatitis with an abscess and associated purulent peritonitis. Peritoneal fluid cultures grew Raoultella planticola and a light growth of Candida albicans. The organism isolated, R. planticola, is a waterborne bacterium with limited previous clinical isolates causing morbidity but no previously described mortality. Vitreous humor analysis demonstrated concomitant acute water intoxication complicating the decedent's diabetes insipidus. Discussion includes a review of the literature with a description of the eight previous cases of human infection with R. planticola, a recently described organism that was previously in the genus Klebsiella. The proposed fatal pathogenesis includes retrograde entry of the organism from the gastrointestinal tract via the pancreatic duct to the pancreas and subsequent peritonitis. This is the first reported fatality caused by this organism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0080.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademic Forensic PathologySame topicGut microbiota and healthFrench-language works237,207