MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Early Intervention with Dietary Fish Oil, Flax Oil and Soy Protein in Three Orthologous Rodent Models of Human Hereditary Polycystic Kidney Disease

2016· article· en· W2605566454 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jessay G. Devassy, Md Monirujjaman, Melissa Gabbs, Harold M. Aukema

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital Research Institute of ManitobaUniversity of ManitobaSt. Boniface Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsSoy proteinFish oilFood scienceFish <Actinopterygii>RodentBiologyPolycystic kidney diseaseMedicineKidneyEndocrinologyFishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hereditary polycystic kidney disease (PKD) is characterized by countless renal cysts and often also displays significant liver cysts. Due to lack of a cure and the inefficacy of current treatments in delaying renal replacement therapy, there is much interest in the potential for dietary approaches to slow PKD progression. Rationale for current dietary advice is based in part on animal studies that have examined primarily male animals and non‐orthologous models with rapidly developing cystic disease. For example, in Han:SPRD‐ Cy rat and pcy mouse models, soy protein feeding results in lower kidney size and water content, along with reduced cyst growth and fibrosis. Dietary flax oil also has similar benefits in both of these models. However, fish oil appears to have beneficial effects in the Han:SPRD‐ cy rat, but not always in the pcy mouse. Since dietary studies have not used orthologous models of PKD, the objective of the current studies were to examine the effects of dietary soy protein or oils enriched in omega‐3 fatty acids on early disease progression in orthologous models. These were male and female Mx1Cre + Pkd1 flox/flox (Pkd1) mice induced at 5 and 1 weeks of age and Pkd2 WS25/− (Pkd2) mice, as models of autosomal dominant PKD (ADPKD), and male PCK rats as a model of autosomal recessive PKD (ARPKD). The control diet was the AIN93G diet that has casein as the protein source and soy oil as the lipid source. Experimental groups were given a comparison diet which contained either an equivalent amount of protein as soy protein that replaced the casein, or either flax oil or fish oil that replaced 80% of the soy oil. Dietary treatments were for 6 weeks (Pkd1 mice induced at 1 week of age), 16 weeks (Pkd1 mice induced at 5 weeks of age), 13 weeks (Pkd2 mice) or 12 weeks (PCK rats). Body weight, urine volume and pH and water disappearance were measured during the feeding phase. Kidney, liver and body weights were recorded at termination. Kidney and liver water content was determined by lyophilisation and cyst area and fibrosis were determined by histology. Dietary fish and flax compared to soy oil resulted in less kidney water content in both sexes in Pkd1 mice induced at 5 weeks, but had no effect on renal cyst area or fibrosis in these mice, and no effects on any disease parameters in Pkd1 mice induced at 1 wk. In Pkd2 mice, dietary fish (but not flax) oil resulted in more kidney water content (only) in female Pkd2 mice, but did not affect any other disease parameters. In PCK rats, both fish and flax compared to soy oil resulted in higher kidney water content, as well as cyst area. Dietary soy protein (cf. casein) had no effects on kidney water content or cyst area, and no dietary treatment altered these parameters in the livers of all models. Therefore, in contrast to studies in non‐orthologous models during the rapid cyst growth phase, these studies in male and female orthologous PKD models do not support dietary advice to increase soy protein or oils enriched in omega‐3 oils in early PKD. Support or Funding Information Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicGenetic and Kidney Cyst DiseasesFrench-language works237,207