Relationship of Harvest CD34+ and CD3+ Counts To Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease (cGVHD), Relapse and Survival Following Sibling Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cells are increasingly used as a source of cells for sibling allogeneic transplantation. In comparison with bone marrow transplants (BMT), peripheral blood stem cell transplants (PBSCT) have been associated with increased chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). In order to examine the relationship between CD34+ and CD3+ counts and the development of cGVHD, we analyzed the outcome of patients from an international database of nine randomized trials comparing PBSCT and BMT. There were a total of 1111 patients: 305 patients developed extensive cGVHD, 261 limited cGVHD, 368 had no cGVHD and 177 did not have adequate information concerning cGVHD for analysis. We excluded patients with limited cGVHD because this can be a difficult diagnosis to make with certainty. We also excluded those without adequate data and thus the analysis is based on 673 patients (305 with extensive cGVHD and 368 with no cGVHD). There was no common baseline hazard for the development of extensive cGVHD among studies and thus the analysis was stratified by study. The primary outcomes were time to development of extensive cGVHD and time to the composite endpoint of death or relapse. Harvest CD34+ and CD3+ counts were analyzed as dichotomous variables based on the median cell counts. In the PBSCT group, the median CD34+ and CD3+ counts were 6.05 and 288.01×106/kg and in the BMT group, the median CD34+ and CD3+ counts were 2.89 and 32.79×106/kg respectively. As previously reported, there was an increased risk of developing extensive cGVHD with PBSCT compared to BMT (hazard ratio 1.77, 95% CI 1.39–2.23). The time to develop extensive cGVHD was not affected by the CD34+ or CD3+ count within either the PBSCT or BMT group. In addition, the composite endpoint of death or relapse was also not affected by either the CD34+ or CD3+ count in the PBSCT group. However, in the BMT group, a higher median CD3+ count was associated with an increased risk of death or relapse (p=0.04). Furthermore, a higher median CD34+ count was associated with a trend to a decreased risk of death or relapse (p=0.09). In summary, we confirm the higher risk of developing extensive cGVHD with PBSCT compared to BMT. In this analysis, we did not find a relationship between CD34+ and CD3+ counts and the risk of extensive cGVHD within either the PBSCT or BMT groups. However, our analysis suggests an association between higher median CD3+ counts and an increased risk of death or relapse in the BMT group. If this observation is confirmed, further studies are required to determine whether the higher CD3+ cell content of the marrow graft exerts a direct effect on the risk of relapse or death, or whether it is a surrogate for a less effective marrow harvest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".